Quantcast

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: How old does a console have to be to become "Vintage?"

  1. #1
    Requiescat in Pace Master of Shinobi NavesRegge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    The least visited state
    Age
    17
    Posts
    1,117
    Rep Power
    10

    Default How old does a console have to be to become "Vintage?"

    The question was aroused by something on the local game store's site that said they were experts in vintage games such as Atari, NES, Genesis, and N64. The N64 really isn't that old, is it? I don't know if one could call it "vintage" or "retro" just yet. So, about how many years old can a console be (or maybe how many years after it "dies') before it's retro?

    If there is already a thread about this, which I have a feeling there is, feel free to delete this thread.
    Quote from:That Pink Fish Guy

    "Is mayonnaise an instrument?"

    PSN Gamertag: NavesRegge
    Steam ID: navesregge

  2. #2
    The medium-sized mang. Raging in the Streets Lastcallhall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    The Fantasy Zone
    Age
    32
    Posts
    2,769
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Personally, retro only applies to anything before the 32/64 bit revolution in my eyes. It was in that time that there was a huge paradigm shift in what was expected out of what used to be a simple video game. Sony, Sega, Nintendo, and Microsoft all came out swinging with their next-gen consoles, pushing each and every new game as an experience first, and a game second. Not to say that this was a bad thing, but it's hard to have that almost kitsch-like experience with Syphon Filter or Gran Turismo as you do with Super Mario Bros, Sonic the Hedgehog, et al.

    Just my 0.02

  3. #3
    WCPO Agent JRedmond3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    842
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    I was looking around Ebay and one seller called the PS2 retro. So yeah, people are going a little overboard with what they consider vintage or retro nowadays.
    Last edited by JRedmond3; 07-07-2010 at 05:36 PM.

  4. #4
    Nemo my name forever more Master of Shinobi Waterfaller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,843
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lastcallhall View Post
    Personally, retro only applies to anything before the 32/64 bit revolution in my eyes. It was in that time that there was a huge paradigm shift in what was expected out of what used to be a simple video game. Sony, Sega, Nintendo, and Microsoft all came out swinging with their next-gen consoles, pushing each and every new game as an experience first, and a game second. Not to say that this was a bad thing, but it's hard to have that almost kitsch-like experience with Syphon Filter or Gran Turismo as you do with Super Mario Bros, Sonic the Hedgehog, et al.

    Just my 0.02
    I concur. Retro would be anything from 8-bit to 16-bit. I feel "vintage" would probably be best applied to the pre-8-bit systems, like the Ataris, Colecovision, Intellivision, Vectrex, etc.

  5. #5
    Master of Shinobi
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,157
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Well antiques need to be atleast 25 years old(early NES gagame, any older system), I'm pretty sure vintage/classic has to be atleast 15 years old).

    However I find it hard to call anything past the 16bit consoles, Retro.

  6. #6
    Pirate King Phantar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,565
    Rep Power
    41

    Default

    I only consider the Atari 2600 and the Intellivision to be truly Vintage. No, not the Colecovision.

    Why, you ask?





    Friggin' wood paneling! That's just class!
    The funny thing about an oxymoron is, even if you remove the ox, there'll always be a moron. The Question Remains: Y?




    Submitted:
    Teddy Boy Blues (Mega Drive)

    Work in Progress:
    NHL '97 (Genesis)
    FIFA '98: Road to World Cup (Mega Drive)
    Best of the Best: Championship Karate (Genesis)
    Risk (Genesis)

  7. #7
    Road Rasher
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    333
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    I think of anything that is no longer commercially available or supported to be a "classic" console. On my Website, I review games up through the PSX generation, which will include N64 games once I write some reviews. I guess it's because those games have disappeared from the marketplace and are therefore harder to find. I guess I draw the line at obsolescence.

    It's hard to find words to differentiate them all, because the NES is certainly more retro than an N64 is, and an Atari is more retro than a NES, so no one wants to lump them all into the same category.

    Chris

  8. #8
    Wildside Expert Markss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    237
    Rep Power
    4

    Default

    how long before a console becomes retro
    Xbox live gamertag: Markss720

  9. #9
    Outrunner the.importer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Canada, Montreal
    Posts
    529
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    Well since this is a personal opinion and that no one can show any facts regarding this, I'd say a system becomes retro 2 generations after the one it lived in. PS2, XBOX, GameCube, Dreamcast, I wouldn't call them retro, I would call them last Gen. Everything during the 5th generation and before would be Retro.

  10. #10
    So's your old man! Master of Shinobi zetastrike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    everywhere
    Posts
    1,725
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    I've always considered everything before the 3D shift to be retro. Modern games are pretty much all 3D now, sad as it is.
    You know who else loves Sega....

  11. #11
    Antiquing Shining Hero QuickSciFi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Age
    33
    Posts
    13,166
    Rep Power
    95

    Default

    To me, the rule for "retro" has to be at least two (2) console generations ago. The Dreamcast, Xbox, Gamecube or, even, PS2, would not count right now. In this case: Sega Saturn, PS1, N64 and anything before that.

    "Vintage," on the other hand, would be at least 1.5 to two human generations ago. That means at least 30 years (Atari 2600, original Sega's own Duck Hunt 'O Matic, etc...).

  12. #12
    Firebomber7 Outrunner Breetai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    539
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jibbajaba View Post
    I think of anything that is no longer commercially available or supported to be a "classic" console. On my Website, I review games up through the PSX generation, which will include N64 games once I write some reviews. I guess it's because those games have disappeared from the marketplace and are therefore harder to find. I guess I draw the line at obsolescence.

    It's hard to find words to differentiate them all, because the NES is certainly more retro than an N64 is, and an Atari is more retro than a NES, so no one wants to lump them all into the same category.

    Chris
    I agree with this. I suppose this would make the CD the most "retro" system. I guess technically the X-Box would fall under this definition, but that just doesn't feel right.

  13. #13
    inspiried Scott Pilgrim Rusty Venture's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Vereinigte Staaten!
    Posts
    12,229
    Rep Power
    81

    Default

    Vintage = Anything before the NES/MS
    Classic = 8/16-bit years
    Nostalgic = 32bit to DC
    Modern = PS2 to today.


    Join the USA/NZ strike force team!
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantar View Post
    a swedish android, awakened by the touch of Raśl Julia...

  14. #14
    pew pew pew!! Wildside Expert Tears of Ash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Murfreesboro, Tennessee
    Age
    26
    Posts
    155
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    I hate the word 'retro'. Not sure if I like vintage either.

    Classic on the other hand implies that it is old, but still loved. I run into people who claim they are 'trv retro gamers' because they own a NES/SNES/n64/PSone and such. That's why I don't lke that term.

    So with that in mind, in regards to the OP, I feel that a console's age isn't too relevant. How old to be 'vintage'. Well, I guess one or two generations of people. (not generations of consoles. A lot of us grew up during different eras, so I guess it's different for everyone. Although I feel it would suffice to give one or two generation gaps before I'd call something vintage. 15-25 years feels about right.

    For instance, I consider laserdiscs old, but not necessarily vintage. They were created withing fifteen years of my birth, so in an attempt to make myself not feel old, clearly things from that era can't be vintage. Reel-to-reels on the other hand, I'd definitely say so.

    Personally, I'd consider most 70s and early 80s gaming to be vintage. Gaming has changed so much since then, that regular duration doesn't seem to fit. Mid-80s to mid-90s can be classic. (not to say that the vintage systems aren't classic either).

    Gah. Every time there's a thread asking to define words or something, I always make a mess out of my thoughts.
    Blog (reviews, podcasts, music shows, interviews)

  15. #15
    The Best Genesis Master of Shinobi GohanX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,846
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    This thread makes me feel really old.
    Quote Originally Posted by CMA Death Adder
    Recently I sold the majority of my 32X games for a measly 18 bucks. With it, I bought some tacos. Definitely a more pleasing choice.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •