I suggest we write our names down when repping the coop and Baloo.
I suggest we write our names down when repping the coop and Baloo.
babaloo!
Perhaps It has to do with all the word processing programs I've ever used were made in America, and If you type Colour instead of color, it'll underline it in red, saying it's wrong because Americans don't spell it that way. Perhaps we need a Canadian/British programmed word processor to clear the confusion!![]()
I spell color and neighbor the American way because I feel it's pointless to add the extra U just because the Queen of England says so. It's like saying Zed over Zee. The latter is way easier to say the letter Z. Do whatever is most comfortable for you.
I don't really need any rep. I have way more than my peers as it is (and by peers I mean people who've registered around the same time I did).![]()
![]()
My selling thread, a loose Suikoden II, lots of PS1 stuff, a sealed Primal Rage 32X, a CIB SMS system and more!
My feedback thread
Haha, you did? Thanks Shinobi, they don't tell you when people do that, interestingly enough. The Meseta system is OK, there's not very much benefit to it on a small forum without many features, and after a while the shine wears off as you can't do much more with it than make your name in different colors and effects.
I hate the Rep System, you can't give XX amount people some rep
"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to X again"
I gave like 5 diff people some rep, and it still says that message
+ rep to Baloo!![]()
If I get more rep power do I get all buff and hairy like in Altered Beast? I mean more so than I already am.
Question: is this reputation thing based solely on number of reputations given?
I rarely give reps, but ultimately when I try to do it the engine NEVER lets me, saying I should spread it somewhere else......
I suggest adding a new criterion: if no rep was given for a certain amount of time (1 month etc.) lift the block for new reps.
What's the turnover value before one can rep the same person again? That is how many others must be repped before the first can be again? I thought it was 10 but based on a recent dialogue involving my nonreceipt of a rep and after having tried to rep some members who aren't on my Rep Given list it seems evident that can't be the correct #.
Alternatively some members may be permanently unable to rep others due to broken addresses (invalid redirects?) when clicking the button. That sounds like far too large a problem to solve, especially in proportion to its triviality.
what gives?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)