I don't know what you're saying. I mean, if you, personally, simply don't think this game is 9/10 material, then that's fine; we all disagree with reviews and you are, of course, free to your own opinion. Personally, if I were reviewing this game, I would've given it an 8.
However, I disagree with the notion that a game needs to be "revolutionary" in order to earn a 9/10 (or even a 10/10). I hold that opinion generally; I'm not making any sort of exception for this game. I especially think that for reviews of classic games, whether the game did anything revolutionary or not is kind of irrelevant. Who cares whether a game was "fresh" 11-18 years ago? I'm living in the present.