Quantcast

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Very impressive NAOMI 2 tech-demos from JAMMA 2000

  1. #1
    Road Rasher parallaxscroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Age
    33
    Posts
    420
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Very impressive NAOMI 2 tech-demos from JAMMA 2000

    http://s.dcmovies.ign.com/media/news...segatech01.mov

    http://s.dcmovies.ign.com/media/news...egatech201.mov

    http://s.dcmovies.ign.com/media/news...egatech301.mov

    http://s.dcmovies.ign.com/media/news...egatech401.mov

    These are beautiful demos for NAOMI 2, a board that was basicly inbetween Dreamcast/NAOMI and the never-seen, canceled Dreamcast-successor that Sega was working on in 1999-2000 before they decided to exit hardware.


    If Sega had made another console, I'd say it would've been well beyond both the NAOMI 2 (and thus, those demos) and the Xbox1-based Chihiro board, perhaps about on par with the Lindbergh board, which is just slightly below the Xbox 360 & PS3 in overall CPU & GPU performance.

    Who knows, maybe we'd be playing After Burner Climax at home.

  2. #2
    eat ninjitsu death! Rusty Venture's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Vereinigte Staaten!
    Posts
    12,407
    Rep Power
    87

    Default

    After Burner Climax


    Join the USA/NZ strike force team!
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantar View Post
    a swedish android, awakened by the touch of Raśl Julia...

  3. #3
    Sports Talker Martin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    They look a bit rubbish, to me. If this was what the Dreamcast 2 was to be, then this is what we'd be playing now. Blocky geometry, unimpressive physics. Didn't look like anything that couldn't be done on PS2. Besides, these are not real-world gaming conditions. Technology demos are notoriously misleading in that regard. Each demo will only focus on one or two things, chucking the entirety of the hardware's resources at demoing these one or two things. Put all these things together, add collision, NPC AI, game logic and so forth - the graphics would not be able to attain the same level of detail.

    Consider that the detail isn't that impressive anyway, and you get a 'meh' from me.

  4. #4
    Road Rasher Puffy2k316's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    426
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    The NAMOI 2 ended up being used for tons of arcade games. It was the board Virtua Fighter 4 ran on, which was quite an impressive looking game for the time.

  5. #5
    Where are the bits?! ESWAT Veteran j_factor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Oakland, representin'
    Posts
    7,147
    Rep Power
    57

    Default

    Naomi 2 was not used for that many games. Aside from VF4, it was basically just Initial D, Club Kart, Beach Spikers, Virtua Striker 3, King of Route 66, and that's about it. The original Naomi was much, much more popular, and in fact is possibly the most popular arcade board of all time, aside from Neo Geo.

    It's hard to tell how good a tech demo is from a camcorder pointed at a monitor.


    You just can't handle my jawusumness responces.

  6. #6
    Road Rasher parallaxscroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Age
    33
    Posts
    420
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Puffy2k316 View Post
    The NAMOI 2 ended up being used for tons of arcade games. It was the board Virtua Fighter 4 ran on, which was quite an impressive looking game for the time.

    The original NAOMI was used for a ton of arcade games, but as j_factor pointed out, NAOMI 2 was only used for a handful of games. Sega quickly switched over to the more powerful Xbox1-based Chihiro board which pretty much replaced NAOMI 2 as the most powerful arcade board of the time, in the early part of this decade.

    The NAOMI 2 is clearly more powerful than NAOMI, based not just on the tech demos but actual games. Although it wasn't a totally new architecture from NAOMI, the NAOMI 2 was a big leap in performance, more so than going from the GameCube to the Wii.

    NAOMI 2 had double the pixel performance and much greater geometry performance than Dreamcast/NAOMI.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •