Count to 15000!

[QuickSciFi]

6950

Mgman, shut the fuck up.

This made my day, btw. ^^

[mgman]

MrMatthews: I don't need to listen to a thing you have to say.

It's pretty clear that you and QuickSciFi are close buddies on this forum, so I take anything in your posts with a grain of salt. Same with QuickSciFi, who has to quote his buddy's post 2 posts later to kiss up.

6951

[The Jackal]

Do you even know what I was accused of? Do you even know what misunderstanding I'm in? I guess not.

Dude, if this all over Melf saying you posting a link to a ROM when you say you didn't; just let it slide. Is it really that worthwhile and so urgent?

I don't think so; just drop it.

[mgman]

Look, Jackal, I understand that you helped me before. But this argument is not about my account situation. It has to do with QuickSciFi who felt the need to run a flamewar and begin the whole matter, as well as falsely accuse me of being someone else. And then his friend MrMatthews who felt the need to tag along.

[QuickSciFi]

I'm pretty certain I didn't call you any names. I was talking about a 20-something year old who recently got on my nerves. I don't even know your age, dude. But by the looks of it, you're either 20-something or the term "manchild" must have gotten you butthurt-enough for you to believe that, indeed, you are.

and also,
Don't forget to count:

6954

[mgman]

Don't play stupid, here. Your first post directed at me implies you referring to me with such a term. And for what, triple posting? A simple cut it out, without being a smartass, would have sufficed.

I can't picture you being any different from "20-something" years old, considering you have to use tired internet expressions like butthurt.

6955

[MrMatthews]

6956

Just to be clear, I was irritated with you before QuickScifi said anything. I stepped in again when you started shooting your mouth off. And yes, I consider QuickScifi a friend, and I don't like seeing my friends disrespected.

[QuickSciFi]

Don't play stupid, here. Your first post directed at me implies you referring to me with such a term. And for what, triple posting? A simple cut it out, without being a smartass, would have sufficed.
I can't picture you being any different from "20-something" years old, considering you have to use tired internet expressions like butthurt.

6955

I knew you were a tripple poster, but I didn't know you were also a tripple failure:

1. You managed to get into an argument with another member by post 10. Good call.

2. You still can't see that you're not the "20-something manchild" to whom I was referring (even though you've now officially managed to make me think of you in that manner. So, again, good call on that).

3. It seems the "manchild" in you has made you forget that in my "first post directed at [you] implies [I'm] referring to [you]" as "the man". Go back and read page 462 of this very same thread, if you will. And, thus, once more, good call on getting mad at me for no reason.

6923

And, thus, mgman becomes "The Man".

6957

[Baloo]

Relax guys, no need to get into petty arguments over double and triple-posts.

That being said, mgman don't double post just so you can get enough posts to make your own thread. Relax, hang out a little bit. Post once or twice in each thread, bump some old ones, start up some new discussion. That's why we have the rule in effect.

Nobody's in the right here for letting it continue on and on, but mgman nobody directly called you a manchild, and they did tell you to simply knock it off, and not in a rude way either..

[MrMatthews]

6958

Also mg, if you go back a page, you'll see that both of us did give you a simple "cut it out." But you had to be a punk, huh?

[QuickSciFi]

6960

[mgman]

MrMatthews: You are justified to be irritated at me for triple posting.

QuickSciFi: Sure, I'll play your game. Tripple... and more than once (if that was intentional, how pointless).

1. Getting into an argument on an internet forum about game-based products in under 10 posts counts as failure to you? I can't even begin to describe the fail in your thinking; but I'll just point out that you didn't hold back, yourself.

2. Let's see:

Most other sites are ridden with children. We get those here sporadically, but overall, we seem to be free of childish non-sense (albeit getting the occasional 20-something manchild).

S[p]eaking of which:

mgman, care to stop?

Unless you're terrible at English, which I doubt, "Speaking of which" isn't innocent in the least bit.

3. Oh, I'm sorry. Let me be specific, then, and tell you which post I was referring to. See 2.

Baloo: Fine, I'll take your advice and drop it here.

6961

[QuickSciFi]

6962

[mgman]

6963

[QuickSciFi]

incorrect

6964