info

platform:

Genesis

Genre:

RPG

Publisher:

Sega

Developer:

Sega

Difficulty:

Moderate

No. of Players:

1 player

Released:

1991

Media

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

Review

Fatal Labyrinth

By: Vince Thornburg | March 02, 2005

Imagine going down the video game isle at Toys 'R Us in early 1991. You see various Game Boy, NES, TG-16 titles, and of course the Genesis games. Before you're changed forever by the release of Sonic later in the year, you see plenty of games that catch your eye.

The cover of one particularly stands out. It features a man in a dungeon with a battle axe who obviously looks prepared for a combat, fully decked in battle armor. With all the other box art around, you decide on buying this one. It looks like a fun RPG, a genre that you've only briefly tasted playing Final Fantasy at a friend's house. You grab the giant yellow ticket, and take it up to the counter. Soon, the game is in your hands. Fatal Labyrinth is its name, and it looks like you've made a wise purchase. The pictures seem to reveal a fun medieval themed RPG. The main selling point, of course, is the words used to describe it on the back of the box. The words promise a fun dungeon adventure, with various creatures to fight and destroy. It promises 30 random levels, which are never the same. It promises replay value, and overall, great pride in helping reveal the goblet, which has been stolen by a dragon. You are TRYKARR, and you must defeat the evil! Adventure and surprise are promised!

You drive home, and quickly put the game in your Genesis. It starts off nice enough, until you start to play. That's when you realize, Sega has some of the best liars in the world!

You begin as a simple villager with a knife. Stabbing bats and little green booger things (named jellys). Of course, normal stabbing would involve pressing a button to move your weapon. But not here, instead you just hold your D pad in the direction of the bad guy, and that's it. Unless you're shooting arrows (which are barely needed), the A,B, and C buttons aren't used for anything in combat. C brings up the menu, which is where one of the game's few highlights come from. You have canes and scrolls, which both are used to either hurt an enemy, or find some armor in the next room. Also, it can prevent your armor from rusting.

Yes, rust, from your LEATHER armor. Of course, when you get the steel stuff, that's when these items should become useful. But I have NEVER experienced rust. Anyway, the game also has assorted rings, which are used mostly to throw at enemies, much like almost anything else you get, makes this game mostly a collecting adventure. And if you get a cursed item, just restart your game.

The music is okay at the beginning, but when there are only TWENTY notes repeating over and over, it becomes slightly ear-breaking. Are there small sword-like sounds when you impact a foe? No, that would make the game a bit more bearable. Instead, you get an almost plopping sound when you make a hit, and a ding when you miss. I think a few enemies make sounds when using magic, but that's about it.

The graphics themselves seem dated, even for a game from 1991. Trykaar moves in small little steps, which can be slowed down if you either grab too much gold (which just buys more homeless guys to cry at your burial), or if you eat too much food. I'll get to the food fiasco in a minute. Anyway, the basic background is just that, basic. It's sad, even after the great title screen, and the pretty good look of the town, and we get this simple floor plot. The bad guys have two sprites: one for moving and one for standing still. Moving involves walking and hitting, making it a bit hard to tell exactly what's going on. Even striking a bad guy is simplified. Want to know when you're attacking? Just simply see if the 2 pixel sword moves a millimeter! If it hits, the bad guy disappears! No dust, no mini explosion, no blinking away. they simply vanish. I guess Sega didn't have too much money to spend on graphics.

Now, on this whole food thing. To make this game more RPG-like, a system of food, gold, and levels was added. It's a simple system really, considering that the main game is barely affected by it. The ranking system just basically adds a few hit points, and raises defense a bit, but you'll still be losing all the time from the 30 diamond thingys shooting magic at you. The food though, is what can really set you off. As your walking, you'll see pot roasts just lying on the ground. Seeing as this is the middle ages, Ebola means nothing to you, so eat up! If you DON'T eat up, you go hungry. And if you get to hungry, you die. Now what set me off so much is how the food works. If you eat too little, you die. If you eat too much, you become a fat slob and walk REEEEEEEALY SLOOOOOOOW, so slow that you can barely attack, and may as well just quit (Quitting may seem like a bad thing, but you'll be wanting an excuse to stop playing this). The thing is, you can never know exactly how much is too much, as it always seems to be as random as the levels themselves, making things a lot more harder than they should be.

And about the whole claim of random levels. Sure, playing the first few times, the levels will seem random and pretty creative. But soon, you will practically have all the maps memorized (down to the last hidden door). This kills any last bit of fun that could have been had.

The last thing here is the difficulty of the game itself. Things may start out easy, but you'll quickly be stuck in a sleep trap, as your HP slowly melts away, snails slowly touch your ass until you die. Sure, the game is beatable, but it's barely enough fun to make it worth it. If it were fun, the difficulty could be almost acceptable, but it isn't.

Overall, it was a good effort, but it seems to have lost something in development, like focus being brought to another project (*cough, Sonic, cough*). I try to like this game, and I kind of do, but in the end, it's still a stinker.

Reviewer Score: 4.0   |   Avg. Reader Score: 4.7
<<Discuss this Review>>

 

Comments


Add a Comment:
(you must be a registered forum member to comment)

Username:

Password:

Score:

Comment (400 characters left):


Current Comments:
User:Score:Date:Comment:
Benjamin 6 May 21, 2009 I'm a fan of the game, but I cannot ignore how bland it looks. The gameplay is on the simple side, but the fun and challenge comes from simple survival and exploration -- the way RPGs used to be. Fatal Labyrinth is a decent rogue-like game, but playing it one cannot help but feel like the developers phoned it in. If you're a fan of Nethack, check it out but keep your expectations at the door.
 
Iced Snowman 1 February 27, 2009 Playing this cart will bring you the same satisfaction as chewing shards of glass.
 
acdc 7 January 21, 2008 i really liked it its much like dragon crystel even the same without the dragon