For the record: I'm a cissexual heteronormative guy, married with child. But it's interesting to see what kind of assumptions and insinuations some people tend to immediately jump to. They seem to be so easily triggered these days.
And I am Not "offended.", though I can see why some people would be. But as I tried (and was apparently not quite able to) explain, my "problem" is that the Game ('s designer) wants me to fight through hordes of these enemies without giving me any proper reason or frame of reference to do so. The Game gives me even less of a Backstory or Baseline between 'good guys' and 'bad guys' than Final Fight or even Bad Dudes in my opinion. These enemies are just there because, well, they are kind of similar to certain enemies in these older beat'em'ups. But whereas, for example, 'Ash' in Bare Knuckle 3 was a memorable encounter in its own right, in Paprium you geht flooded with these enemies for no real reasons - they might just as well be your standard SoR-style Galcia for all the difference it makes. The way it is used here, it just comes across as juvenile. Imagine If "Cho Aniki" suddenly started to creep into "Streets of Rage". That's just not good Game design in my opinion.
Last edited by Phantar; 01-24-2021 at 03:56 AM.
The funny thing about an oxymoron is, even if you remove the ox, there'll always be a moron. The Question Remains: Y?
The background story is in the manga.
It's very classic, some apocalyptic devastation, last city on the planet. Like in Demolition Man.
And like in Demolition Man shops no longer exist, the only clothes shops left are sexy shops.
In this megalopolis everyone is evil and corrupted.
There are giants, like in Kenshiro, and some people got mutation, probably due to the pollution.
A very common mutation seem to be the tongue enlargement, that's why most people stay with the tongue out.
Last edited by majinga; 01-24-2021 at 12:43 PM.
I don't see how you could think I was referring to your review given the other post I made in this thread but I'll assume you have misunderstood. I was referring to what goes on at other websites, particularly Polygon and Kotaku and not the substance of your own review, which as you say, only dwelt briefly on that subject matter.
My mistake, but it kind of gave the impression that it's also referring to the review itself when it's standing by its own in the top of Page 2 of replies. Didn't see your earlier reply (or rather, forgot you Made another comment as well.) Anyways, sorry for misunderstanding. /Edit: I've decided to delete the Post.
Last edited by Phantar; 01-24-2021 at 12:46 PM.
The funny thing about an oxymoron is, even if you remove the ox, there'll always be a moron. The Question Remains: Y?
Great review Phantar. Nice to see some critique of the content that would have gotten a rise out of teenagers in the 90s as not quite being worth it to be in the game, even if it "fits" thematically. As someone who didn't know squat about this game until two months ago (I don't follow the homebrew scene despite the long thread here on the boards) I thought it was a concise, great review. Nice job.
Furthermore, game starts right away with cops blasting Dice's door and beating you.
I don't get what else you need to know in order to figure that cops are your enemies?
...Or maybe I'm just getting old and did not try modern "comply and stay in jail forever" beat 'em up.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)